This is a blog you can read.

-Captain Obvious

Why I haven’t been blogging:

  • My life has been really busy, especially with spending 4 hours commuting every day.
  • Most of the things I think about are obscure (Circuses in the Victorian Era/Gilded age), annoying (Christine O’Donnell), I talk about too much anyway (My Chemical Romance’s new album), or things no one wants to hear about (the Rachel Maddow joke in this week’s 30 Rock).
  • Although I have a lot to say, much of it is personal.
  • I’m lazy.
  • I do want to make a post about my name change, though. Although I’m changing my name, I don’t think I’ll be changing my domain for a while.

    My name has bothered me for quite a long time. For most of my life, I thought I couldn’t do much to change it, other than go by nicknames. The idea to change my name has been with me for quite a while, and I’ve decided to go with it.

    I chose Alexis because it’s a name I have liked for years. Literally. When I was a kid, any boy doll/animal/what have you was named Jonathan and all the girls were named Alexis/Alexandria. I’d often said I’d name my kid Renee Alexis to keep the whole “Name your daughter your middle name” alive, until I discovered how much my middle name does not fit me either. And I know most of the people who know me now will continue to call me Lee/LeAnne, but I would like to be able to introduce myself as Alex. And I appreciate everyone who’s being cool with this, and trying to accept it.

The future is bulletproof.


Danger Days: The True Lives of the Fabulous Killjoys.

If you had to throw away either your TV or your computer, which would you choose?

This one is actually applicable to me right now, because I’m kind of wondering how much space I will have if I move into a studio apartment, I don’t know if I’d have room for both.

I would definitely choose my computer, because I can watch most of the shows I normally watch over the internet as well as DVDs, as well as all the other things you can do with a computer. I mean, without a computer, I couldn’t check my email, blog, update my netflix or any other number of things I do on a regular basis.

Ask me anything

Alice in Wonderland review (because Micah reminded me I have a blog)

I had mixed feelings going into this movie. On the one hand, it’s a Tim Burton movie featuring Johnny Depp. On the other hand, it’s a Tim Burton movie featuring Johnny Depp.

Alice in Wonderland

For the most part, I was pleasantly surprised. The graphics are amazing and the plot, while a bit confusing and helter-skelter at parts, held my interest for the whole film.

The film adds to the story of Lewis Carroll’s “Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland” and “Through the Looking Glass” with the story of a fully-grown Alice (Mia Wasikowska). When pressured to marry someone who doesn’t really like her, she instead chases after a rabbit in a waistcoat and finds herself tumbling to “Underland” once again.

This movie was much darker than I expected, although I should have known better. The original story may be creepy in its own right, but Burton’s touch amplifies it.

One of the most disturbing moments I’ve ever seen in an ostensibly children’s film has a miniature Alice working her way across the moat to the Red Queen’s castle by jumping from one bodyless head to another.

Although I’ve grown up with the phrase “off with their head!” ground into my brain, I still was not expecting to see the gory aftermath.

I found Depp’s Mad Hatter to be problematic. I felt like he, like much of the rest of the movie, was trying too hard to make everything confusing. Although, to be honest, I had a hard time concentrating on what he was saying because his enormous green eyes kept distracting me.

His split personality between a happy hatter and an intense revolutionary with a Scottish accent jolted me out of the story instead of drawing me into it.

The supporting characters were masterfully done, especially Helena Bonham Carter’s Red Queen and Anne Hathaway’s White Queen. Chessur (Stephen Fry) and Absolem the Caterpillar (Alan Rickman) both are interestingly animated and voiced.

Like most of Burton’s films, it’s hard to talk about this one without mentioning the scenery and costumes. The art, like most of his other films, is simply stunning.

Although the movie did have some excellent parts (including a sword vs. sewing supplies fight), the ending was weak.

Burton created an interesting movie, with a unique plot and memorable characters, and ended it with just another story of a female protagonist rebelling against Victorian gender roles.*

Written for the Royal Purple.

*I’d like to clarify this, which I didn’t have enough time to in the original article. I feel as though far too many films force modern ideals on a historical time. Feminism is an example of this. While I know that there were many women who were ahead of their time socially, I get tired of so many historical films focusing on them. Just because we think a certain way now does not in any way mean that this was always the opinion. I think it’s lazy of filmmakers to always have the protagonist with modern sensibilities instead of taking the time to show us why they might have a different outlook.

On stereotypical romances.

Imagine with me a moment. Think of a book where the heroine’s best qualities seem to be that she is quiet, controlled and, quite honestly, boring. She is longsuffering, putting up with family and friend’s antics. She is in love with someone who others in society think is not a good match for her, but she loves him. They separate, and she flirts with someone else because she thinks her true love doesn’t love her. But, instead, she runs after him and then they realize they’ve loved each other all along and get married.

Twilight? Yes. But it’s also the plot to Persuasion by Jane Austen.

I had to read this book for a class, and I ended up telling my professor I thought it was like Twilight for the Romantic era. To me, it’s just another bland romance that is focused on the relationship between the two most boring people in the entire story. I wish the book had been about Admiral and Mrs. Croft’s adventures on the high seas, or maybe focused more on why Charles and Mary got together.

Instead the entire book is Anne wangsting about her lost love without doing anything to actively pursue it. She’s willing to give up without even trying. The only reason she gets together with him is because he writes her a letter explaining how he feels.

I understand. This book is supposed to represent the social mores females had to traverse during that time period. But that doesn’t make it a great piece of literature. It just makes it relevant to the time. And also, really really boring.

Switch to our mobile site